Agents handle the volume. Engineers handle the judgment. You review working software every week — never a big-bang delivery at the end.
A free 30-minute call turns your brief into a fixed scope, timeline, and price. Planning agents decompose the requirements into an architecture and task graph; a senior engineer reviews it before anything is quoted.
Coding agents implement modules in parallel around the clock, while testing agents validate every change the moment it lands. Anything that fails is routed to a repair agent with full failure context.
Human leads sign off on architecture decisions, security-sensitive paths, and every milestone. Auth, payments, and PII changes always require mandatory human review — nothing sensitive ships on autopilot.
Load testing, security review, and polish — then production. You own the code, IP, and documentation outright. Optional agent-based maintenance keeps the system monitored, patched, and evolving.
A 15-minute screen-share, every week, of the actual running software — not a slide deck. If something's off, you say so Tuesday, not three months from now.
